Paper detail

WMAP constraints on Cardassian model

We have investigated the constraints on the Cardassian model using the recent results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) for the locations of the peaks of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anistropy spectrum. We find that the model is consistent with the recent observational data for certain range of the model parameter $n$ and the cosmological parameters. We find that the Cardassian model is favoured compared to $Λ$CDM model, for a higher spectral index ($n_s \approx 1$) together with lower value of Hubble parameter $h$ ($h\leq 0.71$). But for smaller values of $n_s$, both $Λ$CDM and Cardassian are equally favoured. Also, irrespective of Supernova constraint, CMB data alone predicts current acceleration of the universe in this model. We have also studied the constraint on the $σ_{8}$, the rms density fluctuations at $8h^{-1}$ Mpc scale.

preprint2003arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.