Paper detail

WIYN Open Cluster Study. XLVIII. The Hard-Binary Population of NGC 188

(abridged) We present an in-depth study of the hard-binary population of the old (7 Gyr) open cluster NGC 188. The main-sequence solar-type hard binaries in NGC 188 are nearly indistinguishable from similar binaries in the Galactic field. We find a global solar-type main-sequence hard-binary frequency in NGC 188 of 29 +/- 3 % for binaries with periods less than 10^4 days. For main-sequence hard binaries in the cluster we observe a log-period distribution that rises towards our detection limit, a roughly Gaussian eccentricity distribution centered on e = 0.35 (for binaries with periods longer than the circularization period), and a secondary-mass distribution that rises towards lower-mass companions. Importantly, the NGC 188 blue straggler binaries show significantly different characteristics than the solar-type main sequence binaries in NGC 188. We observe a blue straggler hard-binary frequency of 76 +/- 19 %, three times that of the main sequence. The blue straggler binary eccentricity - log period distribution is distinct from that of the main sequence at the 99% confidence level, with the majority of the blue straggler binaries having periods of order 1000 days and lower eccentricities. The secondary-mass distribution for these long-period blue straggler binaries is narrow and peaked with a mean value of about 0.5 Msun. Predictions for mass-transfer products are most closely consistent with the binary properties of these NGC 188 blue stragglers, which comprise two-thirds of the blue straggler population. Additionally we compare the NGC 188 binaries to those evolved within the sophisticated Hurley et al. (2005) N-body open cluster simulation. We find that additional simulations with initial conditions that are better motivated by observations are necessary to properly investigate the dynamical evolution of a rich binary population in open clusters like NGC 188.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.