Paper detail

WISE view of changing-look AGNs: evidence for a transitional stage of AGNs

The discovery of changing-look active galactic nuclei (CLAGNs) with the significant change of optical broad emission lines (optical CLAGNs) and/or strong variation of line-of-sight column densities (X-ray CLAGNs) challenges the orientation-based AGN unification model. We explore mid-infrared (mid-IR) properties for a sample of 57 optical CLAGNs and 11 X-ray CLAGNs based on the {\it Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer} ({\it WISE}) archive data. We find that Eddington-scaled mid-IR luminosities of both optical and X-ray CLAGNs stay just between low-luminosity AGNs (LLAGNs) and luminous QSOs. The average Eddington-scaled mid-IR luminosities for optical and X-ray CLAGNs are $\sim 0.4$\% and $\sim 0.5$\%, respectively, which roughly correspond the bolometric luminosity of transition between a radiatively inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) and Shakura-Sunyaev disk (SSD). We estimate the time lags of the variation in the mid-IR behind that in the optical band for 13 CLAGNs with strong mid-IR variability, where the tight correlation between the time lag and the bolometric luminosity ($τ- L$) for CLAGNs roughly follows that found in the luminous QSOs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.