Paper detail

Wind modelling of very massive stars up to 300 solar masses

Some studies have claimed a universal stellar upper-mass limit of 150 Msun. A factor that is often overlooked is that there might be a difference between the current and initial masses of the most massive stars, as a result of mass loss. We present Monte Carlo mass-loss predictions for very massive stars in the range 40-300 Msun, with large luminosities and Eddington factors Gamma. Using our new dynamical approach, we find an upturn in the mass-loss vs. Gamma dependence, at the point where the winds become optically thick. This coincides with the location where wind efficiency numbers surpass the single-scattering limit of Eta = 1, reaching values up to Eta = 2.5. Our modelling suggests a transition from common O-type winds to Wolf-Rayet characteristics at the point where the winds become optically thick. This transitional behaviour is also revealed with respect to the wind acceleration parameter beta, which starts at values below 1 for the optically thin O-stars, and naturally reaches values as high as 1.5-2 for the optically thick Wolf-Rayet models. An additional finding concerns the transition in spectral morphology of the Of and WN characteristic He II line at 4686 Angstrom. When we express our mass-loss predictions as a function of the electron scattering Gamma_e (=L/M) only, we obtain a mass-loss Gamma dependence that is consistent with a previously reported power-law Mdot propto Gamma^5 (Vink 2006) that was based on our semi-empirical modelling approach. When we express Mdot in terms of both Gamma and stellar mass, we find Mdot propto M^0.8 Gamma^4.8 for our high Gamma models. Finally, we confirm that the Gamma-effect on the mass-loss predictions is much stronger than that of an increased helium abundance, calling for a fundamental revision in the way mass loss is incorporated in evolutionary models of the most massive stars.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.