Paper detail

Wind mass transfer in S-type symbiotic binaries III. Confirmation of a wind focusing in EG Andromedae from the nebular [OIII]λ5007 line

Context. The structure of the wind from the cool giants in symbiotic binaries carries important information for understanding the wind mass transfer to their white dwarf companions and its fuelling. Aims. In this paper, we indicate a non-spherical distribution of the neutral wind zone around the red giant (RG) in the symbiotic binary star, EG And. Methods. We achieved this aim by analysing the periodic orbital variations of fluxes and radial velocities of individual components of the H$α$ and [OIII]$λ$5007 lines observed on our high-cadence medium (R $\sim$ 11 000) and high-resolution (R $\sim$ 38 000) spectra. Results. The asymmetric shaping of the neutral wind zone at the near-orbital-plane region is indicated by: (i) the asymmetric course of the H$α$ core emission fluxes along the orbit; (ii) the presence of their secondary maximum around the orbital phase $φ= 0.1$, which is possibly caused by the refraction effect; and (iii) the properties of the H$α$ broad wing emission originating by Raman scattering on H$^0$ atoms. The wind is substantially compressed from polar directions to the orbital plane as constrained by the location of the [OIII]$λ$5007 line emission zones in the vicinity of the RG at/around its poles. The corresponding mass-loss rate from the polar regions of $\lesssim 10 ^{-8}$ Msun/yr is a factor of $\gtrsim 10$ lower than the average rate of $\approx 10^{-7}$Msun/yr derived from nebular emission of the ionised wind from the RG. Furthermore, it is two orders of magnitude lower than that measured in the near-orbital-plane region from Rayleigh scattering. Conclusions. The startling properties of the nebular [OIII]$λ$5007 line in EG And provides an independent indication of the wind focusing towards the orbital plane.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.