Paper detail

Wind Collision and Accretion Simulations of the Massive Binary System HD 166734

We run hydrodynamic simulations which follow the colliding winds structure of the massive binary system HD 166734 along its binary orbit, and show that close to periastron passage the secondary wind is suppressed and the secondary accretes mass from the primary wind. The system consists two blue supergiants with masses of $M_1 \approx 39.5 ~\rm{M_\odot}$ and $M_2 \approx 30.5 ~\rm{M_\odot}$, on a $P \simeq 34.538 ~\rm{days}$ orbit with eccentricity of $e \approx 0.618$. This close O-O binary with high eccentricity is observed through its orbit in the X-rays, where it shows an unusual long minimum close to periastron passage. We use advanced simulations with wind acceleration and prescription treatment of accretion and simulate the entire orbit at high resolution that captures the instabilities in the winds. We find that the colliding wind structure is unstable even at apastron. As the stars approach periastron passage the secondary wind is quenched by the primary wind and the accretion onto the secondary begins. The accretion phase lasts for $\simeq 12 ~\rm{days}$, and the amount of accreted mass per cycle we obtain is $M_{\rm{acc}} \simeq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-8} ~\rm{M_\odot}$. The accretion phase can account for the observed decline in X-ray emission from the system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.