Paper detail

Wiedemann-Franz law in scattering theory revisited

The violation of Wiedemann-Franz (WF) law has been widely discussed in quantum transport experiments as an indication of deviation from Fermi-liquid behavior. The conventional form of WF law is only concerned with the transmission function at Fermi-level which, however, vanishes in many practical situations. We reinvestigate the WF law in noninteracting quantum systems with vanishing zero energy transmission and report a universal number $21/5$ as an upper bound of Lorenz ratio $\mathscr{R}$ in weakly energy-dependent scattering theory. We provide different experimental realizations for the observation of $\mathscr{R}=21/5$ namely the transport setups with graphene, the multi-level quantum dot and double quantum dot. The reported universal Lorenz ratio paves an efficient way of experimentally obtaining the information about the associated quantum interferences in the system. Our work also provides enough evidence which concludes that the violation of WF law does not necessarily imply the non-Fermi-liquid nature of underlying transport processes; equally, the Fermi-liquid transport characteristics cannot be concluded by an observed validation of WF law.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.