Paper detail

Width deviation of convex polygons

We consider the width $X_T(ω)$ of a convex $n$-gon $T$ in the plane along the random direction $ω\in\mathbb{R}/2π\mathbb{Z}$ and study its deviation rate: $$ δ(X_T)=\frac{\sqrt{\mathbb{E}(X^2_T)-\mathbb{E}(X_T)^2}}{\mathbb{E}(X_T)}. $$ We prove that the maximum is attained if and only if $T$ degenerates to a $2$-gon. Let $n\geq 2$ be an integer which is not a power of $2$. We show that $$ \sqrt{\fracπ{4n\tan(\fracπ{2n})} +\frac{π^2}{8n^2\sin^2(\fracπ{2n})}-1} $$ is the minimum of $δ(X_T)$ among all $n$-gons and determine completely the shapes of $T$'s which attain this minimum. They are characterized as polygonal approximations of equi-Reuleaux bodies, found and studied by K.~Reinhardt. In particular, if $n$ is odd, then the regular $n$-gon is one of the minimum shapes. When $n$ is even, we see that regular $n$-gon is far from optimal.We also observe an unexpected property of the deviation rate on the truncation of the regular triangle.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.