Paper detail

Wide binaries in Planetary Nebulae with Gaia DR2

Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) was used to select a sample of 211 central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) with good quality astrometric measurements, that we refer to as GAPN, Golden Astrometry Planetary Nebulae. Gaia astrometric and photometric measurements allowed us to derive accurate distances and radii, and to calculate luminosities with the addition of self-consistent literature values. Such information was used to plot the position of these stars in a Hertzsprung-Russel (HR) diagram and to study their evolutionary status in comparison with CSPNe evolutionary tracks. The extremely precise measurement of parallaxes and proper motions in Gaia DR2 has allowed us to search for wide binary companions in a region close to each of the central stars in the GAPN sample. We limited our search to a region around 20,000 AU of each CSPN to minimise accidental detections, and only considered stars with good parallax and proper motions data, i.e. with errors below 30% in DR2. We determined that the hypothetical binary pairs should show a statistically significant agreement for the three astrometric quantities, i.e. parallax and both components of proper motions. We found 8 wide binary systems among our GAPN sample. One of them is in a triple system. We compiled the astrometric and photometric measurements of these binary systems and discussed them in comparison with previously published searches for binaries in PNe. By analysing the position in the HR diagram of the companion stars using Gaia photometry, we are able to estimatetheir temperatures, luminosities, masses and, for one star, the evolutionary age. The derived quantities yield a consistent scenario when compared with the corresponding values as obtained for the central stars using stellar evolutionary models in the postAGB phase.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.