Paper detail

Wide Binaries as a Modified Gravity test: prospects for detecting triple-system contamination

Recent studies have shown that velocity differences of very wide binary stars, measured to high precision with GAIA, can provide an interesting test for modified-gravity theories which emulate dark matter; in essence, MOND-like theories (with external field effect included) predict that wide binaries (wider than ~ 7 kAU) should orbit ~ 15% faster than Newtonian for similar orbits; such a shift is readily detectable in principle in the sample of 9,000 candidate systems selected from GAIA EDR3 by Pittordis and Sutherland (2022; PS22). However, the main obstacle at present is the observed "fat tail" of candidate wide-binary systems with velocity differences at ~1.5 - 6x circular velocity; this tail cannot be bound pure binary systems, but a possible explanation of the tail is triple or quadruple systems with unresolved or undetected additional star(s). While this tail can be modelled and statistically subtracted, obtaining an accurate model for the triple population is crucial for a robust test for modified gravity. In this paper we explore prospects for observationally constraining the triple population: we simulate a population of hierarchical triple systems "observed" as in PS22 at random epochs and viewing angles; for each simulated system we evaluate various possible methods for detecting the third star, including GAIA astrometry, radial velocity drift, and several imaging methods from direct Rubin images, speckle imaging and coronagraphic imaging. Results are generally encouraging, in that typically 90% of the triple systems in the key regions of parameter space are detectable; there is a moderate "dead zone" of cool brown-dwarf companions at ~ 25-100 AU separation which are not detectable with any of our baseline methods. A large but feasible observing campaign can greatly clarify the effect of the triple/quadruple population and make the gravity test decisive.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.