Paper detail

Why Simple Stellar Population models do not reproduce the colours of Galactic open clusters

(...) We search for an explanation of the disagreement between the observed integrated colours of 650 local Galactic clusters and the theoretical colours of present-day SSP models. We check the hypothesis that the systematic offsets between observed and theoretical colours, which are $(B$$-$$V)\approx 0.3$ and $(J$$-$$K_s)\approx 0.8$, are caused by neglecting the discrete nature of the underlying mass function. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we construct artificial clusters of coeval stars taken from a mass distribution defined by an Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) and compare them with corresponding "continuous-IMF" SSP models. If the discreteness of the IMF is taken into account, the model fits the observations perfectly and is able to explain naturally a number of red "outliers" observed in the empirical colour-age relation. We find that the \textit{systematic} offset between the continuous- and discrete-IMF colours reaches its maximum of about 0.5 in $(B$$-$$V)$ for a cluster mass $M_c=10^2 m_\odot$ at ages $\log t\approx 7$, and diminishes substantially but not completely to about one hundredth of a magnitude at $\log t >7.9$ at cluster masses $M_c> 10^5 m_\odot$. At younger ages, it is still present even in massive clusters, and for $M_c \leqslant 10^4 m_\odot$ it is larger than 0.1 mag in $(B$$-$$V)$. Only for very massive clusters ($M_c>10^6 m_\odot$) with ages $\log t< 7.5$ is the offset small (of the order of 0.04 mag) and smaller than the typical observational error of colours of extragalactic clusters.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.