Paper detail

Why radio quiet quasars are preferred over radio loud quasars regardless of environment and redshift

Evidence has accumulated suggesting the clustering of radio loud quasars is greater than for radio quiet quasars. We interpret these results in a context in which the fraction of radio loud quasar formation is less than or equal to that for radio quiet quasars for all environments and redshift. Because we assume that post-merger cold gas onto large black holes produces either a radio loud or a radio quiet quasar, we show that for largest black hole masses that live in largest dark matter halos, fRLQ approaches 0.5 from below but does not exceed it, such that in rich clusters the formation of a radio loud quasar tends to be equally likely to occur as a radio quiet quasar. In dark matter halos with smaller mass, by contrast, radio quiet quasars are more likely to form and the likelihood increases inversely with dark matter halo mass. As a result, averaging over a population of radio loud and radio quiet quasars will necessarily generate lower average black hole masses for the radio quiet subgroup. Hence, despite the fact that the formation of radio quiet quasars is preferred over radio loud quasars in any environment, at any mass scale, at any luminosity, or redshift, averaging over a range of radio loud quasars will give the appearance they are preferred in cluster environments over radio quiet quasars. We show how this also accounts for the order of magnitude difference in the total number of jetted active galaxies compared to non-jetted counterparts.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.