Paper detail

Why not Neutrinos as the Dark Matter? A Critical Review, KATRIN and New Research Directions

We challenge the traditional wisdom that cosmological (big bang relic) neutrinos can only be hot Dark Matter. We provide a critical review of the concepts, derivations and arguments in foundational books and recent publications that led respected researchers to proclaim that "[Dark Matter] cannot be neutrinos". We then provide the physics resulting in relic neutrino's significant power loss from the interaction of its anomalous magnetic moment with a high-intensity primordial magnetic fields, resulting in subsequent condensation into Condensed Neutrino Objects (CNOs). Finally, the experimental degenerate mass bounds that would rule out condensed cosmological neutrinos as the Dark Matter (unless there is new physics that would require a modification to the CNO Equation of State) are provided. We conclude with a discussion on new directions for research.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.