Why is the Zc(3900)Z_c(3900) absent in the hcπh_cπ final state?

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this work, we perform a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of the exotic hadronic states Zc(3900)Z_c(3900), Zc(4020)Z_c(4020), Zb(10610)Z_b(10610) and Zb(10650)Z_b(10650) within the framework of Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry (HQSS) and its violation. By constructing S-wave contact interactions between elastic (DDˉ∗/D∗Dˉ∗D\bar{D}^*/D^*\bar{D}^* or BBˉ∗/B∗Bˉ∗B\bar{B}^*/B^*\bar{B}^*) and inelastic (J/ψπ,hcπJ/ψπ, h_cπ or ΥπΥπ, hbπh_bπ) channels, we solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to obtain physical production amplitudes and perform a global fit to experimental invariant-mass spectra. Our results demonstrate a striking difference between the charm and bottom sectors: HQSS violation is negligible in the bottom system, leading to comparable peak structures for both ZbZ_b states in all hidden-bottom decay channels. In contrast, significant HQSS breaking is required to describe the ZcZ_c system, where the violation is predominantly concentrated in the elastic interactions. This explains the observed selectivity: Zc(3900)Z_c(3900) appears prominently only in J/ψπJ/ψπ, while Zc(4020)Z_c(4020) appears only in hcπh_cπ. Pole analysis confirms the molecular nature of the states, with the Zc(4020)Z_c(4020) likely arising from a threshold cusp effect. The model's robustness is verified against variations of the form factor and cutoff, showing stable results.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.