Paper detail

Why is High Energy Physics Lorentz Invariant?

Despite the tremendous empirical success of equivalence principle, there are several theoretical motivations for existence of a preferred reference frame (or aether) in a consistent theory of quantum gravity. However, if quantum gravity had a preferred reference frame, why would high energy processes enjoy such a high degree of Lorentz symmetry? While this is often considered as an argument against aether, here I provide three independent arguments for why perturbative unitarity (or weak coupling) of the Lorentz-violating effective field theories put stringent constraints on possible observable violations of Lorentz symmetry at high energies. In particular, the interaction with the scalar graviton in a consistent low-energy theory of gravity and a (radiatively and dynamically) stable cosmological framework, leads to these constraints. The violation (quantified by the relative difference in maximum speed of propagation) is limited to $\lesssim 10^{-10} E({\rm eV})^{-4}$ (superseding all current empirical bounds), or the theory will be strongly coupled beyond meV scale. The latter happens in extended Horava-Lifshitz gravities, as a result of a previously ignored quantum anomaly. Finally, given that all cosmologically viable theories with significant Lorentz violation appear to be strongly coupled beyond meV scale, we conjecture that, similar to color confinement in QCD, or Vainshetin screening for massive gravity, high energy theories (that interact with gravity) are shielded from Lorentz violation (at least, up to the scale where gravity is UV-completed). In contrast, microwave or radio photons, cosmic background neutrinos, or gravitational waves may provide more promising candidates for discovery of violations of Lorentz symmetry.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.