Paper detail

Why, how and when MHD turbulence at low $Rm$ becomes three-dimensional

MHD turbulence at low Magnetic Reynolds number is experimentally investigated by studying a liquid metal flow in a cubic domain. We focus on the mechanisms that determine whether the flow is quasi-2D, 3D or in any intermediate state. To this end, forcing is applied by injecting a DC current $I$ through one wall of the cube only, to drive vortices spinning along the magnetic field. Depending on the intensity of the externally applied magnetic field, these vortices extend part or all of the way through the cube. Driving the flow in this way allows us to precisely control not only the forcing intensity but also its dimensionality. A comparison with the theoretical analysis of this configuration singles out the influences of the walls and of the forcing on the flow dimensionality, which is characterised in several ways. First, when inertia drives three-dimensionality, the velocity near the wall where current is injected scales as $U_b\sim I^{2/3}$. Second, when the distance $l_z$ over which momentum diffuses under the action of the Lorentz force reaches the channel width $h$, the velocity near the opposite wall $U_t$ follows a similar law with a correction factor $(1-h/l_z)$. When $l_z<h$, by contrast, the opposite wall has less influence on the flow and $U_t\sim I^{1/2}$. The central role played by the ratio $l_z/h$ is confirmed by experimentally verifying Sommeria & Moreau (1982)'s scaling $l_z\sim N^{1/2}$ ($N$ is the interaction parameter) and finally, the nature of the three-dimensionality is further clarified by distinguishing weak and strong three-dimensionalities. It is found that both vanish only asymptotically in the limit $N\rightarrow\infty$. This provides evidence that because of the no-slip walls, 1) the transition between quasi-2D and 3D turbulence does not result from a global instability of the flow, and 2) it doesn't occur simultaneously at all scales.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.