Paper detail

Why hot Jupiters can be large but not too large

Tidal heating is often used to interpret "radius anomaly" of hot Jupiters (i.e. radii of a large fraction of hot Jupiters are in excess of 1.2 Jupiter radius which cannot be interpreted by the standard theory of planetary evolution). In this paper we find that tidal heating induces another phenomenon "runaway inflation" (i.e. planet inflation becomes unstable and out of control when tidal heating rate is above its critical value). With sufficiently strong tidal heating, luminosity initially increases with inflation, but across its peak it decreases with inflation such that heating is stronger than cooling and runaway inflation occurs. In this mechanism, the opacity near radiative-convective boundary (RCB) scales approximately as temperature to the fourth power and heat cannot efficiently radiate away from planet interior, which induces runaway inflation (similar to a tight lid on a boiling pot). Based on this mechanism, we find that radii of hot Jupiters cannot exceed $2.2R_J$, which is in good agreement with the observations. We also give an upper limit for orbital eccentricity of hot Jupiters. Moreover, by comparison to the observations we infer that tidal heating locates near RCB.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.