Paper detail

Why do mayflies change their gill kinematics as they grow?

The mayfly nymph breathes under water through an oscillating array of wing-shaped tracheal gills. As the nymph grows, the kinematics of these gills change abruptly from rowing to flapping. The classical fluid dynamics approach to consider the mayfly nymph as a pumping device fails in giving clear reasons to this switch. In order to understand the whys and the hows of this switch between the two distinct kinematics, we analyze the problem under a Lagrangian viewpoint. We consider that a good Lagrangian transport that distributes and spreads water and dissolved oxygen well between and around the gills is the main goal of the gill motion. Using this Lagrangian approach we are able to provide the reason behind the switch from rowing to flapping that the mayfly nymph experiences as it grows. More precisely, recent and powerful tools from this Lagrangian approach are applied to in-sillico mayfly nymph experiments, where body shape, as well as, gill shapes, structures and kinematics are matched to those from in-vivo. In this letter, we show both qualitatively and quantitatively how the change of kinematics enables a better attraction, stirring and confinement of water charged of dissolved oxygen inside the gills area. From the computational velocity field we reveal attracting barriers to transport, i.e. attracting Lagrangian coherent structures, that form the transport skeleton between and around the gills. In addition, we quantify how well the fluid particles and consequently dissolved oxgen is spread and stirred inside the gills area.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.