Paper detail

Why do Black Holes Trace Bulges (& Central Surface Densities), Instead of Galaxies as a Whole?

Previous studies of fueling black holes (BHs) in galactic nuclei have argued (on scales ~0.01-1000pc) accretion is dynamical with inflow rates $\dot{M}\simη\,M_{\rm gas}/t_{\rm dyn}$ in terms of gas mass $M_{\rm gas}$, dynamical time $t_{\rm dyn}$, and some $η$. But these models generally neglected expulsion of gas by stellar feedback, or considered extremely high densities where expulsion is inefficient. Studies of star formation, however, have shown on sub-kpc scales the expulsion efficiency $f_{\rm wind}=M_{\rm ejected}/M_{\rm total}$ scales with the gravitational acceleration as $(1-f_{\rm wind})/f_{\rm wind}\sim\bar{a}_{\rm grav}/\langle\dot{p}/m_{\ast}\rangle\sim Σ_{\rm eff}/Σ_{\rm crit}$ where $\bar{a}_{\rm grav}\equiv G\,M_{\rm tot}(<r)/r^{2}$ and $\langle\dot{p}/m_{\ast}\rangle$ is the momentum injection rate from young stars. Adopting this as the simplest correction for stellar feedback, $η\rightarrow η\,(1-f_{\rm wind})$, we show this provides a more accurate description of simulations with stellar feedback at low densities. This has immediate consequences, predicting e.g. the slope and normalization of the $M-σ$ and $M-M_{\rm bulge}$ relation, $L_{\rm AGN}-$SFR relations, and explanations for outliers in compact Es. Most strikingly, because star formation simulations show expulsion is efficient ($f_{\rm wind}\sim1$) below total-mass surface density $M_{\rm tot}/π\,r^{2}<Σ_{\rm crit}\sim3\times10^{9}\,M_{\odot}\,{\rm kpc^{-2}}$ (where $Σ_{\rm crit}=\langle\dot{p}/m_{\ast}\rangle/(π\,G)$), BH mass is predicted to specifically trace host galaxy properties above a critical surface brightness $Σ_{\rm crit}$ (B-band $μ_{\rm B}^{\rm crit}\sim 19\,{\rm mag\,arcsec^{-2}}$). This naturally explains why BH masses preferentially reflect bulge properties or central surface-densities ($Σ_{1\,{\rm kpc}}$), not 'total' galaxy properties.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.