Paper detail

Why binary interaction does not necessarily dominate the formation of Wolf-Rayet stars at low metallicity

Classical Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars are massive, hydrogen depleted, post main-sequence stars that exhibit emission-line dominated spectra. For a given metallicity Z, stars exceeding a certain initial mass M_single(Z) can reach the WR phase through intrinsic mass-loss (single-star channel). Stars of lower masses can reach the WR phase via binary mass transfer (binary channel). It is commonly assumed that the binary channel dominates the formation of WR stars in environments with low Z such as the SMC and LMC. However, their reported WR binary fractions of 30-40% are comparable to that of the Galaxy. Here, we explain this apparent contradiction by considering the minimum initial mass M_spec(Z) needed for the stripped product to appear as a WR star. We calibrate M_spec(Z) using the lowest-luminosity WR stars in the Clouds and the Galaxy. A range of M_single(Z) values are explored using various evolution codes. We estimate the additional contribution of the binary channel by considering the interval [M_spec(Z), M_single(Z)], which characterises the initial-mass range in which binaries can form additional WR stars. Results: The WR-phenomenon ceases below luminosities of logL = 4.9, 5.25, and 5.6 [Lsun] in the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC, which translates to He-star masses of 7.5, 11, 17 Msun and initial masses of M_spec = 18, 23, 37 Msun. Stripped stars with lower initial masses in the respective galaxies would tend to not appear as WR stars. M_single lies in the range 20-30, 30-60, and > 40 Msun for the Galaxy, LMC, and SMC. We find that that the additional contribution of the binary channel is a non-trivial function of Z that cannot be conclusively claimed to be monotonically increasing with decreasing Z. Hence, one should not a-priori expect that binary interactions become increasingly important in forming WR stars at low Z, or that the WR binary fraction grows with decreasing Z.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.