Paper detail

White dwarf -- red giant star binaries as Type Ia supernova progenitors: with and without magnetic confinement

Various white-dwarf (WD) binary scenarios have been proposed trying to understand the nature and the diversity of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). In this work, we study the evolution of carbon-oxygen WD -- red giant (RG) binaries (including the role of magnetic confinement) as possible SN Ia progenitors (the so-called symbiotic progenitor channel). Using the \textsc{mesa} stellar evolution code, we calculate the time dependence of the structure of the RG star, the wind mass loss, the Roche-lobe-overflow (RLOF) mass-transfer rate, the polar mass-accretion rate (in the case of magnetic confinement), and the orbital and angular-momentum evolution. We consider cases where the WD is non-magnetic and cases where the magnetic field is strong enough to force accretion onto the two small polar caps of the WD. Confined accretion onto a small area allows for more efficient hydrogen burning, potentially suppressing nova outbursts. This makes it easier for the WD to grow in mass towards the Chandrasekhar mass limit and explode as a SN Ia. With magnetic confinement, the initial parameter space of the symbiotic channel for SNe Ia is shifted towards shorter orbital periods and lower donor masses compared to the case without magnetic confinement. Searches for low-mass He WDs or relatively low-mass giants with partially stripped envelopes that survived the supernova explosion and are found in SN remnants will provide crucial insights for our understanding of the contribution of this symbiotic channel.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.