Paper detail

White Dwarf Pulsars as Possible Cosmic Ray Electron-Positron Factories

We suggest that white dwarf (WD) pulsars can compete with neutron star (NS) pulsars for producing the excesses of cosmic ray electrons/positrons observed by the PAMELA, ATIC/PPB-BETS, Fermi and HESS experiments. A merger of two WDs leads to a rapidly spinning WD with a rotational energy comparable to the NS case. The birth rate is also similar, providing the right energy budget for the cosmic ray electrons/positrons. Applying the NS theory, we suggest that the WD pulsars can in principle produce electrons/positrons up to 10 TeV. In contrast to the NS model, the adiabatic and radiative energy losses of electrons/positrons are negligible since their injection continues after the expansion of the pulsar wind nebula, and hence it is enough that a fraction 1% of WDs are magnetized as observed. The long activity also increases the number of nearby sources, which reduces the Poisson fluctuation in the flux. The WD pulsars could dominate the quickly cooling electrons/positrons above TeV energy as a second spectral bump or even surpass the NS pulsars in the observing energy range 10 GeV - 1 TeV, providing a background for the dark matter signals and a nice target for the future AMS-02, CALET and CTA experiment.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.