Paper detail

Which random walks are cyclic?

A cyclic random walk is a random walk whose transition probabilities/rates can be written as a superposition of the empirical measures of a family of finite cycles. This identifies a convex set of models. We discuss the problem of characterization of cyclic random walks in some special cases showing that it is related to several remarkable and classical results. In particular we introduce the notion of balanced measure and show that a translation invariant random walk on $\mathbb Z^d$ is cyclic if and only if its transition probability is balanced. The characterization of the extremal elements is obtained using the Carathéodory's Theorem of convex analysis. We then show that a random walk on a finite set is cyclic if and only if at every vertex the outgoing flux of the transition graph is equal to the ingoing flux. The extremal elements are characterized by the Birkhoff-Von-Neumann Theorem. Finally we consider the discrete torus and discuss when the cyclic decomposition can be done using only homotopically trivial cycles or elementary cycles associated to edges and two dimensional faces. While in one dimension this is equivalent to require some geometric properties of a discrete vector field associated to the transition rates, in two dimension this is not the case. In particular we give a simple characterization of the polyhedron of the rates admitting a cyclic decomposition with elementary cycles. The proof is based on a discrete Hodge decomposition, elementary homological algebra and the Helly's Theorem of convex analysis. Finally we discuss a natural discretization procedure of smooth divergence free continuous vector fields and an application to random walks in random environments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.