Paper detail

Which Part of Dense Cores Feeds Material to Protostars?: The Case of L1489 IRS

We have conducted mapping observations ($\sim 2'\times2'$) of the Class I protostar L1489 IRS using the 7-m array of the Atacama Compact Array (ACA) and the IRAM-30m telescope in the $\mathrm{C^{18}O}$ 2-1 emission to investigate the gas kinematics on 1000-10,000 au scales. The $\mathrm{C^{18}O}$ emission shows a velocity gradient across the protostar in a direction almost perpendicular to the outflow. The radial profile of the peak velocity was measured from a $\mathrm{C^{18}O}$ position-velocity diagram cut along the disk major axis. The measured peak velocity decreases with radius at a radii of $\sim$1400-2900 au, but increases slightly or is almost constant at radii of $r\gtrsim$2900 au. Disk-and-envelope models were compared with the observations to understand the nature of the radial profile of the peak velocity. The measured peak velocities are best explained by a model where the specific angular momentum is constant within a radius of 2900 au but increases with radius outside 2900 au. We calculated the radial profile of the specific angular momentum from the measured peak velocities, and compared it to analytic models of core collapse. The analytic models reproduce well the observed radial profile of the specific angular momentum and suggest that material within a radius of $\sim$4000-6000 au in the initial dense core has accreted to the central protostar. Because dense cores are typically $\sim$10,000-20,000 au in radius, and as L1489 IRS is close to the end of mass accretion phase, our result suggests that only a fraction of a dense core eventually forms a star.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.