Paper detail

Which Green Functions Does the Path Integral for Quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians Represent?

In the context of quasi-Hermitian theories, which are non-Hermitian in the conventional sense, but can be made Hermitian by the introduction of a dynamically-determined metric $η$, we address the problem of how the functional integral and the Feynman diagrams deduced therefrom "know" about the metric. Our investigation is triggered by a result of Bender, Chen and Milton, who calculated perturbatively the one-point function $G_1$ for the quantum Hamiltonian $H=\half(p^2+x^2)+igx^3$. It turns out that this calculation indeed corresponds to an expectation value in the ground state evaluated with the $η$ metric. The resolution of the problem turns out be that, although there is no explicit mention of the metric in the path integral or Feynman diagrams, their derivation is based fundamentally on the Heisenberg equations of motion, which only take their standard form when matrix elements are evaluated with the inclusion of $η$.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.