Paper detail

Which glass stability parameters can assess the glass-forming ability of oxide systems?

Glass forming ability (GFA) is a property of utmost importance in glass science and technology. In this paper, we used a statistical methodology---involving bootstrap sampling and the Wilcoxon test---to find out which glass stability parameters can better predict the glass forming ability. We collected or measured the necessary data for twelve stoichiometric oxide glasses that underwent predominant heterogeneous nucleation (the most common case). We found that some GS parameters could predict the GFA of these oxide glasses quite well, whereas others perform poorly. Parameter $K_w$ was the top ranked, closely followed by the $K_H$, $γ$, $H^{'}$, $ΔT_{rg}$, and $K_{cr}$. Our results corroborate previous reports carried out using a smaller number of glasses, much less GS parameters, and less rigorous statistics. We also found that using $T_c$ instead of $T_x$ improved the predictive power of these parameters. Finally, the Jezica, the only parameter considered here that predicts the GFA without requiring the production of a glass piece (i.e., without relying on any crystallization information), ranked reasonably well in our analysis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.