Paper detail

Which Adaptation Logic? An Objective and Subjective Performance Evaluation of HTTP-based Adaptive Media Streaming Systems

Multimedia content delivery over the Internet is predominantly using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) as its primary protocol and multiple proprietary solutions exits. The MPEG standard Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) provides an interoperable solution and in recent years various adaptation logics/algorithms have been proposed. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no comprehensive evaluation of the various logics/algorithms. Therefore, this paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of ten different adaptation logics/algorithms, which have been proposed in the past years. The evaluation is done both objectively and subjectively. The former is using a predefined bandwidth trajectory within a controlled environment and the latter is done in a real-world environment adopting crowdsourcing. The results shall provide insights about which strategy can be adopted in actual deployment scenarios. Additionally, the evaluation methodology described in this paper can be used to evaluate any other/new adaptation logic and to compare it directly with the results reported here.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.