Paper detail

Where to Find Habitable "Earths" in Circumbinary Systems

Hitherto, six P-type planets are found around five binary systems, i.e. Kepler-16 b, 34 b, 35 b, 38 b, 47 b, c, which are all Neptune or Jupiter-like planets. The stability of planets and the habitable zones are influenced by the gravitational and radiative perturbations of binary companions. In this Letter, we check the stability of an additional habitable Earth-mass planet in each system. Based on our simulations in 10 Myr, a habitable "Earth" is hardly stable in Kepler-16 while a stable "Earth" in Kepler-47 close to the boundaries of the habitable zone is possible. In contrast, Kepler-34, 35 and 38 seem to have high probabilities of being able to tolerate a stable "Earth" in their habitable zones. The affects of transit time variations are quite small due to the small mass of an undetected "Earth", except that of Kepler-16 b. With a time precision of 0.001 day(~ 88 s), an "Earth" in the corotational resonance with Kepler-16 b can be detected in 3 years, while habitable "Earths" in Kepler-34 and 38 systems can be detected in 10 years. Habitable "Earths" in Kepler-35 and 47 are not likely to be detected in 10 years under this precision.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.