Paper detail

Where is Top?

Possibilities are discussed for determining the top quark mass $m_t$ from observations on the decay processes for top-antitop pairs produced in antiproton-proton collisions, assuming that the $t \to bW^+$ decay channel is dominant and much faster than hadronization. The final states $t \bar{t} \to \bar{b} b μ^\pm e^\mp$ provide the most striking signal, with little background, but they are rare ($\approx 2/81$). If all candidate events prove to be from $t \bar{t}$, an estimate follows for $P(m_t|rate)$, the probability distribution for $m_t$. The one reported configuration allows an independent estimate for $P(m_t|μ^\pm e^\mp \,2jets)$. These two distributions are compatible,yielding an estimate of about 122 GeV. Decay events ``1 energetic lepton($l$) + 4jets'' should appear twelve times as often as ``$μ^\pm e^\mp \,2jets$'' events and can be analysed to give estimates for $P(m_t|l\, 4jets)$. There may be background from non-top events but suitable cuts on the data and our analysis procedure together reduce this to a low level. The rate observed for these events does not appear to be as large as this factor 12. Identification of either or both of the $(b \bar{b})$ jets would be a great step forward. We advocate an energetic approach to the analysis of individual events on an event by event basis, with the hope of finding a subgroup of events with a common mass estimate.

preprint1993arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.