Paper detail

Where is the fuzz? Undetected Lyman alpha nebulae around QSOs at z~2.3

We observed a small sample of 5 radio-quiet QSOs with integral field spectroscopy to search for possible extended emission in the Ly$α$ line. We subtracted the QSO point sources using a simple PSF self-calibration technique that takes advantage of the simultaneous availability of spatial and spectral information. In 4 of the 5 objects we find no significant traces of extended Ly$α$ emission beyond the contribution of the QSO nuclei itself, while in UM 247 there is evidence for a weak and spatially quite compact excess in the Ly$α$ line at several kpc outside the nucleus. For all objects in our sample we estimated detection limits for extended, smoothly distributed Ly$α$ emission by adding fake nebulosities into the datacubes and trying to recover them after PSF subtraction. Our observations are consistent with other studies showing that giant Ly$α$ nebulae such as those found recently around some quasars are very rare. Ly$α$ fuzz around typical radio-quiet QSOs is fainter, less extended and is therefore much harder to detect. The faintness of these structures is consistent with the idea that radio-quiet QSOs typically reside in dark matter haloes of modest masses.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.