Paper detail

Where are the logs?

The commonly quoted error rates for QMC integration with an infinite low discrepancy sequence is $O(n^{-1}\log(n)^r)$ with $r=d$ for extensible sequences and $r=d-1$ otherwise. Such rates hold uniformly over all $d$ dimensional integrands of Hardy-Krause variation one when using $n$ evaluation points. Implicit in those bounds is that for any sequence of QMC points, the integrand can be chosen to depend on $n$. In this paper we show that rates with any $r<(d-1)/2$ can hold when $f$ is held fixed as $n\to\infty$. This is accomplished following a suggestion of Erich Novak to use some unpublished results of Trojan from the 1980s as given in the information based complexity monograph of Traub, Wasilkowski and Woźniakowski. The proof is made by applying a technique of Roth with the theorem of Trojan. The proof is non constructive and we do not know of any integrand of bounded variation in the sense of Hardy and Krause for which the QMC error exceeds $(\log n)^{1+ε}/n$ for infinitely many $n$ when using a digital sequence such as one of Sobol&#39;s. An empirical search when $d=2$ for integrands designed to exploit known weaknesses in certain point sets showed no evidence that $r>1$ is needed. An example with $d=3$ and $n$ up to $2^{100}$ might possibly require $r>1$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.