Paper detail

When was the Large Magellanic Cloud accreted onto the Galaxy ?

Using fully self-consistent N-body models for the dynamical evolution of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) in the Galaxy, we show that if the LMC initially has an extended old stellar halo before its commencement of tidal interaction with the Galaxy, physical properties of the stars stripped from the LMC stellar halo can have fossil information as to when and where the LMC was accreted onto the Galaxy for the first time. If the epoch of the first LMC accretion onto the Galaxy from outside its viriral radius is more than ~4 Gyr ago (i.e., at least two pericenter passages), the stars stripped from the stellar halo of the LMC can form an irregular polar ring or a thick disk with a size of ~100 kpc and rotational kinematics. On the other hand, if the LMC was first accreted onto the Galaxy quite recently (~ 2 Gyr ago), the stripped stars form shorter leading and trailing stellar stream at R=50-120 kpc. Also distributions of the stripped stars in phase space between the two cases can be significantly different. The derived differences in structure and kinematics of the stripped stars therefore suggest that if we compare the observed three-dimensional (3D) distribution and kinematics of the outer Galactic stellar halo along the polar-axis, then we can give strong constraints on the past orbit of the LMC. We find that the orbital properties of the LMC in the successful formation models of the Magellanic Stream (MS) are consistent with those predicted from recent LambdaCDM cosmological simulations. We conclude that the LMC was accreted onto the Galaxy more than ~4 Gyr ago so that interaction between the LMC, the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), and the Galaxy could form the MS and its Leading Arms (LAs).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.