Paper detail

When Should We Treat Galaxies as Isolated?

Traditionally, secular evolution is defined as evolution of systems where the internal growth of structure and instabilities dominates the growth via external drivers (e.g. accretion/mergers). Most study has focused on 'isolated' galaxies, where seed asymmetries may represent realistic cosmological substructure, but subsequent evolution ignores galaxy growth. Large-scale modes in the disk then grow on a timescale of order a disk rotation period (0.1-1 Gyr). If, however, galaxies evolve cosmologically on a shorter timescale, then it may not be appropriate to consider them 'isolated.' We outline simple scalings to ask whether the timescale for secular evolution is shorter than the timescale for cosmological accretion and mergers. This is the case in a narrow, but important range of perturbation amplitudes corresponding to substructure or mode/bar fractional amplitudes 0.01-0.1, a range of interest for observed strong bars and pseudobulges. At smaller amplitudes <<0.1, systems are not isolated: typical disks will grow by accretion at a comparable level over even a single dynamical time. At larger amplitudes >>0.1, the evolution is no longer secular; direct gravitational evolution of the seed swamps the internal disk response. We derive criteria for when disks can be well-approximated as 'isolated' as a function of mass, redshift, and disk stability. The relevant parameter space shrinks at higher mass, higher disk stability, and higher-z as accretion rates increase. Cosmological rates of galaxy evolution also define a maximum bar/mode lifetime of practical interest, of ~0.1/H(z). Longer-lived modes will de-couple from their drivers (if driven) and encounter cosmological effects.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.