Paper detail

WHEN DO SUPERNOVA NEUTRINOS OF DIFFERENT FLAVORS HAVE SIMILAR LUMINOSITIES BUT DIFFERENT SPECTRA ?

Muon and tau neutrinos ($ν_x$) interact with protoneutron star matter only via neutral currents and exchange energy with the stellar gas predominantly by neutrino-electron scattering and neutrino-pair processes. In contrast, electron neutrinos and antineutrinos ($ν_e$ and $\barν_e$) are frequently absorbed and produced in charged-current mediated reactions with nucleons. Therefore the emergent $ν_e$ and $\barν_e$ originate from layers with lower temperatures further out in the star and are emitted with much lower characteristic spectral temperatures. In addition, a major contribution to the $ν_e$ and $\barν_e$ opacities is due to absorptions, while the opacity of $ν_x$ is strongly dominated by scattering reactions with nucleons and nuclei in which the $ν_x$ energy is (essentially) conserved. Therefore the $ν_x$ distribution is nearly isotropic when $ν_x$ decouple energetically and their outward diffusion is slowed down. In a generalized form to include this effect, the Stefan-Boltzmann Radiation Law can account for both the facts that $ν_e$ ($\barν_e$) and $ν_x$ emerge from the star with similar luminosities but with very different characteristic spectral temperatures. Simple analytical expressions to estimate the effect are given. If, as recently argued, even at densities significantly below nuclear matter density neutral-current scatterings were associated with considerable energy transfer between neutrino and target particle, one might expect spectral temperatures of $ν_x$ much closer to those of $ν_e$ and $\barν_e$. This is of relevance for the detection of neutrino signals from supernovae.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.