Paper detail

When Can Non-Gaussian Density Fields Produce a Gaussian Sachs-Wolfe Effect?

The Sachs-Wolfe temperature fluctuations produced by primordial density perturbations are proportional to the potential field ϕ, which is a weighted integral over the density field δ. Because of the central limit theorem, ϕcan be approximately Gaussian even when δis non-Gaussian. Using the Wold representation for non-Gaussian density fields, δ(\rvec) = \int f(|\rvec - \rvec^\prime|) Δ(\rvec^\prime) d^3 \rvec^\prime, we find conditions on Δand f for which ϕmust have a Gaussian one-point distribution, while δcan be non-Gaussian. Sufficient (but not necessary) conditions are that the density field have a power spectrum (which determines f) of P(k) \propto k^n, with -2 < n \le +1, and that Δ(\rvec) be non-Gaussian with no long-range correlations. Thus, there is an infinite set of non-Gaussian density fields which produce a nearly Gaussian one-point distribution for the Sachs-Wolfe effect.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.