Paper detail

What Shapes the Structure of Molecular Clouds: Turbulence or Gravity?

We revisit the origin of Larson's scaling relations, which describe the structure and kinematics of molecular clouds, based on recent observations and large-scale simulations of supersonic turbulence. Using dimensional analysis, we first show that both linewidth-size and mass-size correlations observed on scales 0.1-50 pc can be explained by a simple conceptual theory of compressible turbulence without resorting to the often assumed virial equilibrium or detailed energy balance condition. The scaling laws can be consistently interpreted as a signature of supersonic turbulence with no need to invoke gravity. We then show how self-similarity of structure established by the turbulence breaks in star-forming clouds through development of gravitational instabilities in the vicinity of the sonic scale, l_s~0.1 pc, leading to the formation of prestellar cores.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.