Paper detail

What pp SUSY limits mean for future e$^+$e$^-$ colliders

It is well-known that e$^+$e$^-$ colliders have the power to with certainty exclude or discover any SUSY model that predicts a Next to lightest SUSY particle (an NLSP) that has a mass up to slightly below the half the centre-of-mass energy of the collider. Here, we present an estimation of the power of present and future hadron colliders to extend the reach of searches for SUSY, with particular emphasis whether it can be claimed that either discovery or exclusion is {\it guaranteed} in a region of LSP and NLSP masses - no set of values of the other SUSY could change the conclusion. A scan over SUSY parameter space was done, only requiring that the NLSP was a bosino - the hardest case - with mass not larger than a few TeV. The mass-spectrum, cross-sections and decay branching ratios found in this region were confronted with projections of sensitivity at future hadron colliders. In our conclusions we weigh in the maturity of the analysis the projections are based upon. The conclusion is that although future hadron colliders have a large discovery-reach, i.e. potential to discover {\it some} SUSY model, hardly any models with low-to-medium LSP-NLSP mass-differences can be excluded with certainty. The models that are expected to be excluded/discovered are, on one hand, those with mass-differences larger than those allowed by models with GUT-scale $M_1$-$M_2$ unification, and on the other hand, a tiny region where the mass-difference is so small that the NLSP decays in the tracking volume of the detectors. Excluding the latter possibility does not, however, allow to exclude the possibility of a Wino or Higgsino LSP: at any value of the LSP mass, we could identify models where the NLSP lifetime would be too short for a signal to be seen.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.