Paper detail

What makes normalized weighted satisfiability tractable

We consider the weighted antimonotone and the weighted monotone satisfiability problems on normalized circuits of depth at most $t \geq 2$, abbreviated {\sc wsat$^-[t]$} and {\sc wsat$^+[t]$}, respectively. These problems model the weighted satisfiability of antimonotone and monotone propositional formulas (including weighted anitmonoone/monotone {\sc cnf-sat}) in a natural way, and serve as the canonical problems in the definition of the parameterized complexity hierarchy. We characterize the parameterized complexity of {\sc wsat$^-[t]$} and {\sc wsat$^+[t]$} with respect to the genus of the circuit. For {\sc wsat$^-[t]$}, which is $W[t]$-complete for odd $t$ and $W[t-1]$-complete for even $t$, the characterization is precise: We show that {\sc wsat$^-[t]$} is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) if the genus of the circuit is $n^{o(1)}$ ($n$ is the number of the variables in the circuit), and that it has the same $W$-hardness as the general {\sc wsat$^-[t]$} problem (i.e., with no restriction on the genus) if the genus is $n^{O(1)}$. For {\sc wsat$^+[2]$} (i.e., weighted monotone {\sc cnf-sat}), which is $W[2]$-complete, the characterization is also precise: We show that {\sc wsat$^+[2]$} is FPT if the genus is $n^{o(1)}$ and $W[2]$-complete if the genus is $n^{O(1)}$. For {\sc wsat$^+[t]$} where $t > 2$, which is $W[t]$-complete for even $t$ and $W[t-1]$-complete for odd $t$, we show that it is FPT if the genus is $O(\sqrt{\log{n}})$, and that it has the same $W$-hardness as the general {\sc wsat$^+[t]$} problem if the genus is $n^{O(1)}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.