Paper detail

What is the Top Quark Mass?

In this review I give an overview on the conceptual issues involved in the question how to interpret so-called `direct top quark mass measurements', which are based on the kinematic reconstruction of top quark decay products at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). These measurements quote the top mass parameter $m_t^{\rm MC}$ of Monte-Carlo event generators with current uncertainties of around $0.5$ GeV. At present time the problem of finding a rigorous relation between $m_t^{\rm MC}$ and top mass renormalization schemes defined in field theory is unresolved and touches perturbative as well as nonperturbative aspects and the limitations of state-of-the-art Monte-Carlo event generators. I review the status of LHC top mass measurements, illustrate how conceptual limitations enter and explain a controversy that has permeated the community in the context of the interpretation problem. Recent advances in acquiring first principle insights are summarized, and it is outlined what else has to be understood to fully resolve the issue. For the time being, I give a recommendation how to deal with the interpretation problem when making top mass dependent theoretical predictions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.