Paper detail

What is the real meaning of the Froissart theorem ?

The Froissart bounds for amplitudes and cross sections are explained and reconsidered to clarify the role of different assumptions. It is the physical conditions of unitarity and of no massless exchanges, together with mathematical properties of the Legendre functions, that imply much softer high-energy asymptotics for elastic amplitudes at physical angles than for the same amplitudes at nonphysical angles. The canonical log-squared boundary for σ_{tot} appears only under the additional hypothesis that the amplitude at any nonphysical angle cannot grow faster than some power of energy. The Froissart results are further shown to admit some reinforcement. Comparison of the familiar and new Froissart-like restrictions with the existing data on σ_{tot} and diffraction slope at all available energies (including LHC) does not allow yet to unambiguously determine the asymptotic behavior of σ_{tot}, but shows that its current increase cannot be saturated (i.e., maximally rapid).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.