Paper detail

What is the probability that a random integral quadratic form in $n$ variables is isotropic?

We show that the density of quadratic forms in $n$ variables over ${\mathbb Z}_p$ that are isotropic is a rational function in $p$, where the rational function is independent of $p$, and we determine this rational function explicitly. As a consequence, for each $n$, we determine the probability that a random integral quadratic form in $n$ variables is isotropic. In particular, we show that the probability that a random integral quaternary quadratic form is isotropic is $\approx 97.0\%$, in the case where the coefficients of the quadratic form are independently and uniformly distributed in the range $[-X,X]$ with $X\to\infty$. When random integral quaternary quadratic forms are chosen with respect to the Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble (GOE), the probability of isotropy increases to $\approx 98.3\%$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.