Paper detail

What is the origin of the stacked radio emission in radio-undetected quasars?: Insights from a radio-infrared image stacking analysis

Radio emission in the brightest radio quasars can be attributed to processes inherent to SMBHs, while the origins of the radio fluxes in quasars without radio detections is still uncertain. We investigate the radio-infrared continuum of LOFAR radio-detected quasars (RDQs) and LOFAR radio-undetected quasars (RUQs) in the $9.3\:\textrm{deg}^{2}$ NDWFS-Boötes field; RUQs are quasars that are individually undetected at $\geq5σ$ by LOFAR. We used a median image stacking procedure. This was done in the frequencies of 150 MHz, 325 MHz, 1.4 GHz and 3.0 GHz, and in nine infrared (ir) bands between $8$ and $500\;μ\textrm{m}$. The radio and ir photometry allow us to derive the median spectral energy distributions of RDQs and RUQs in four z-bins between $0<z<6.15$. The ir star-formation rate (SFR) is compared with two independent radio-based star-formation (SF) tracers using the far-ir radio correlation (FIRC) of SF galaxies. We find a good agreement between our radio and ir SFR measurements and the FIRC predictions. Moreover, we use the FIRC predictions to establish the contribution due to SMBH accretion to the total radio-luminosity (RL). We show that SMBH accretion can account for $\sim5-41\%$ of the total RL in median RUQs, while for median RDQs the contribution is $\sim50-84\%$. This implies that vigorous SF activity is coeval with SMBH growth in our median stacked quasars. Furthermore, we investigated the radio-loudness parameter, $R$. For quasars with $R\geq-4.5$, the RL is consistent with being dominated by SMBH accretion, while for low RL quasars with $R<-4.5$ the relative contribution of SF to the radio fluxes increases as the SMBH component becomes weaker. We also find signatures of negative AGN feedback in the brightest median RDQs at 150 MHz. Finally, we found that spectral indices of quasars do not evolve significantly with z, but they become flatter towards lower freqs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.