Paper detail

What is the number of electrons in a spatial domain?

We like to attribute a number of electrons to spatial domains (atoms, bonds, ...). However, as a rule, the number of electrons in a spatial domain is not a sharp number. We thus study probabilities for having any number of electrons (between 0 and the total number of electrons in the system) in a given spatial domain. We show that by choosing a domain that maximizes a chosen probability (or is close to it), one obtains higher probabilities for chemically relevant regions. The probability to have a given electronic arrangement, - for example, by attributing a number of electrons to an atomic shell - can be low. It remains so even in the "best" case, i.e, if the spatial domain is chosen to maximize the chosen probability. In other words, the number of electrons in a spatial region significantly fluctuates. The freedom of choosing the number of electrons we are interested in shows that a "chemical" question is not always well-posed. We show it using as an example the KrF2 molecule.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.