Paper detail

What have we learned about the sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays via neutrino astronomy?

Observations of TeV--PeV-energy cosmic neutrinos by the IceCube observatory have suggested that extragalactic cosmic-ray sources should have an optical depth greater than $\sim$0.01 and contribute to more than 10\% of the observed bulk of cosmic rays at 10 PeV. If the spectrum of cosmic rays from these extragalactic sources extends well beyond 1 EeV, the neutrino flux indicates that extragalactic cosmic-ray protons are dominant in the observed total cosmic-ray flux at 1 EeV. Among known powerful astronomical objects, including gamma-ray bursters (GRBs), only flat-spectrum radio quasars could (barely) satisfy these conditions. On the other hand, the null detection of neutrinos with energies well beyond PeV has excluded the possibility that radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and/or GRBs, the popular source candidates discussed in the literature, are the origins of the highest-energy cosmic rays ($\sim100 {\rm EeV}$) if they are composed mainly of protons. Their origins must be objects that have evolved on time scales comparable to or slower than the star formation rate. These considerations indicate that none of the known extragalactic astronomical objects can be simultaneously a source of both PeV- and trans-EeV-energy cosmic rays. As a result of the stringent limits on EeV-energy neutrino fluxes, a significant part of the parameter space for the AGN and new-born pulsar models is starting to seem unfavorable, even for scenarios of mixed and heavy cosmic-ray compositions at the highest energies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.