Paper detail

What Grassmann Knew: Incidence Theorems on Cubics

Traves and Wehlau recently gave a straightedge construction that checks whether 10 points lie on a plane cubic curve. They also highlighted several open problems in the synthetic geometry of cubics. Hermann Grassmann investigated incidence relations among points on cubic curves in three papers appearing in Crelle's Journal from 1846 to 1856. Grassmann's methods give an alternative way to check whether 10 points lie on a cubic. Using Grassmann's techniques, we solve the synthetic geometry problems introduced by Traves and Wehlau. In particular, we give straightedge constructions that find the intersection of a line with a cubic, find the tangent line to a cubic at a given point, and find the third point of intersection of this tangent line with the cubic. As well, given 5 points on a conic and a cubic and 4 additional points on the cubic, a straightedge construction is given that finds the sixth intersection point of the conic and the cubic. The paper ends with two open problems.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.