Paper detail

What drives the ultra-violet colours of passive galaxies?

We present and analyse optical and ultra-violet colours for passive and optically-red Coma cluster galaxies for which we have spectroscopic age and element abundance estimates. Our sample of 150 objects covers a wide range in mass, from giant ellipticals to the bright end of the dwarf-galaxy regime. We focus on the colours FUV-i, NUV-i, FUV-NUV, u*-g and g-i. We find that all of these colours are correlated with both luminosity and velocity dispersion at the >5 sigma level, with FUV-i and FUV-NUV becoming bluer with increasing `mass' while the other colours become redder. We perform an empirical analysis to assess what fraction of the variation in each colour can be accounted for by variations in the average stellar populations, as traced by the optical spectra. For u*-g and g-i, most of the observed scatter (~80% after allowing for measurement errors and for systematic errors in u*-g) is attributable to stellar population variations, with colours becoming redder with increasing age and metallicity (Mg/H). The FUV-i colour becomes bluer with increasing age and with increasing Mg/H, favouring a `metal-rich single-star' origin for the UV upturn. However, correlations with the optically-dominant stellar populations account for only about half of the large observed scatter. We propose that the excess scatter in FUV-i may be due to a varying proportion of ancient stars in galaxies with younger average ages. The NUV-i colour is sensitive to age and Mg/H, but exhibits excess scatter that can be attributed to `leakage' of the FUV upturn. Applying a correction based on the FUV-i colour we account for ~80% of the variance in NUV-i, as for the optical colours. The FUV-NUV colour shows strong correlations with age and Mg/H, and little residual scatter. Interpreting this colour is complicated however, since it mixes the effects from the main-sequence turn-off with those from the hot evolved stars.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.