Paper detail

What Does the CMS Measurement of W-polarization Tell Us about the Underlying Theory of the Coupling of W-Bosons to Matter?

We discuss results of the CMS collaboration on the sensitivity of the LHC to $W$ boson polarisation in the process $pp\to W^\pm + jet \to e^\pm jet+\not\!\!P_T$ using the $L_P$ variable directly connected to $θ^*$ angle of the outgoing lepton in the rest frame of the decaying $W$. We have shown that for a given $L_P$, interference between different polarizations of the $W$-boson is not negligible, and needs to be taken into account when considering the differential cross-section with respect to $L_P$. The $L_P$ variable suggested by CMS collaboration is highly suitable variable to study LHC sensitivity to $g_V,g_A$ couplings of $W$-boson to fermions. We note that the experimental sensitivity to W-boson polarization which is much higher than that to ($g_V,g_A$) parameter space can be turned around and used to identify deviations from the Standard Model as a signal for new physics at the LHC.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.