Paper detail

What do observations of the Lyman-alpha fraction tell us about reionization?

An appealing approach for studying the reionization history of the Universe is to measure the redshift evolution of the Lyman-alpha fraction, the percentage of Lyman-break selected galaxies that emit appreciably in the Ly-alpha line. This fraction is expected to fall-off towards high redshift as the intergalactic medium becomes significantly neutral, and the galaxies' Ly-alpha emission is progressively attenuated. Intriguingly, early measurements with this technique suggest a strong drop in the Ly-alpha fraction near z ~ 7. Previous work concluded that this requires a surprisingly neutral intergalactic medium -- with neutral hydrogen filling more than 50 % of the volume of the Universe -- at this redshift. We model the evolving Ly-alpha fraction using cosmological simulations of the reionization process. Before reionization completes, the simulated Ly-alpha fraction has large spatial fluctuations owing to the inhomogeneity of reionization. Since existing measurements of the Ly-alpha fraction span relatively small regions on the sky, and sample these regions only sparsely, they may by chance probe mostly galaxies with above average Ly-alpha attenuation. We find that this sample variance is not exceedingly large for existing surveys, but that it does somewhat mitigate the required neutral fraction at z ~ 7. Quantitatively, in a fiducial model calibrated to match measurements after reionization, we find that current z = 7 observations require a volume-averaged neutral fraction of x_HI > 0.05 at 95 % confidence level. Hence, we find that the z ~ 7 Ly-alpha fraction measurements do likely probe the Universe before reionization completes but that they do not require a very large neutral fraction.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.