Paper detail

What did the seahorse swallow? APEX 170 GHz observations of the chemical conditions in the Seahorse infrared dark cloud

We used the APEX telescope to observe spectral lines occurring at about 170 GHz frequency towards 14 positions along the full extent of the filamentary Seahorse infrared dark cloud. Six spectral line transitions were detected ($\geq3σ$) altogether, namely, SO$(N_J=4_4-3_3)$, H$^{13}$CN$(J=2-1)$, H$^{13}$CO$^+(J=2-1)$, SiO$(J=4-3)$, HN$^{13}$C$(J=2-1)$, and C$_2$H$(N=2-1)$. While SO, H$^{13}$CO$^+$, and HN$^{13}$C were detected in every source, the detection rates for C$_2$H and H$^{13}$CN were 92.9% and 85.7%, respectively. Only one source (SMM 3) showed detectable SiO emission (7.1% detection rate). Three clumps (SMM 5, 6, and 7) showed the SO, H$^{13}$CN, H$^{13}$CO$^+$, HN$^{13}$C, and C$_2$H lines in absorption. We found three positive correlations among the derived molecular abundances, of which those between C$_2$H and HN$^{13}$C and HN$^{13}$C and H$^{13}$CO$^+$ are the most significant (correlation coefficient $r\simeq0.9$). The statistically most significant evolutionary trends we uncovered are the drops in the C$_2$H abundance and in the $[{\rm HN^{13}C}]/[{\rm H^{13}CN}]$ ratio as the clump evolves from an IR dark stage to an IR bright stage and then to an HII region. The correlations we found between the different molecular abundances can be understood as arising from the gas-phase electron (ionisation degree) and atomic carbon abundances. The [C$_2$H] evolutionary indicator we found is in agreement with previous studies, and can be explained by the conversion of C$_2$H to other species (e.g. CO) when the clump temperature rises, especially after the ignition of a hot molecular core in the clump. The decrease of $[{\rm HN^{13}C}]/[{\rm H^{13}CN}]$ as the clump evolves is also likely to reflect the increase in the clump temperature, which leads to an enhanced formation of HCN and its $^{13}$C isotopologue.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.