Paper detail

What Can We Learn from the Rising Lightcurves of Radioactively-Powered Supernovae?

The lightcurve of the explosion of a star with a radius <10-100Rsun is powered mostly by radioactive decay. Observationally such events are dominated by hydrogen deficient progenitors and classified as Type I supernovae: white dwarf thermonuclear explosions (Type Ia) and core collapses of hydrogen-stripped massive stars (Type Ibc). Transient surveys are finding SNe I in increasing numbers and at earlier times, allowing their early emission to be studied in unprecedented detail. Motivated by these developments, we summarize the physics that produces their rising lightcurves and discuss how observations can be utilized to study these exploding stars. The early radioactive-powered lightcurves probe the shallowest 56Ni deposits. If the amount of 56Ni mixing can be deduced, then it places constraints on the progenitor and properties of the explosive burning. In practice we find it is difficult to disentangle whether the explosion occurred recently and one is seeing 56Ni heating near the surface or whether the explosion began in the past and 56Ni heating is deeper. In the latter case there is a "dark phase" between the moment of explosion and the first light observed from the shallowest layers of 56Ni. Because of this, simply extrapolating a lightcurve from 56Ni back in time is not a reliable method for estimating the explosion time. The best solution is to directly identify the moment of explosion, by either observing shock breakout or shock-heated surface cooling, so the depth being probed by the rising lightcurve is known. Since this is typically not available, we identify other diagnostics that are helpful for deciphering how recently an explosion occurred. As an example we apply these arguments to the SN Ic PTF 10vgv. We demonstrate that just a single measurement of the photospheric velocity and temperature during the rise places constraints on its explosion time, radius, and 56Ni mixing.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.